A stay is warranted in these circumstances. Striking the right balance may solve the Court’s concerns making the injunction (and perhaps even Apple’s appeal itself) unnecessary.
Apple is carefully working through many complex issues across a global landscape, seeking to enhance information flow while protecting both the efficient functioning of the App Store and the security and privacy of Apple’s customers. The company understands and respects the Court’s concerns regarding communications between developers and consumers. While the appeal is ongoing, Apple has asked the court for a stay on the permanent injunction that requires it to implement those changes by December.Īpple asks the Court to suspend the requirements of its injunction until the appeals filed by both Epic and Apple have been resolved. The Cupertino company is planning to appeal the ruling that would require it to change its App Store rules to allow developers to add in-app links to outside websites, which would pave the way for alternate payment options that do not require developers to use the in-app purchase system. Apple lawsuit back in September, and today filed a notice of appeal with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Apple has opted to appeal the ruling meted out by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in the Epic Games vs.
0 kommentar(er)
